my wish list

mussina · 10-17-2005, 09:37 AM

I am new to the game and new to this forum which I like already. here is my list

1) Hmmv's with tow missles and have some that are equipped with the mark 19 automatic grenade launcher

2) get rid of the bunny hopping I know it probaly is impossible to do last time I checked no one can out jump a bullet.

3) I don't know if it will be in special forces or not but I would like to see silencer on some of the weapons.

4) With anti tank weapons I would like to see that if you hit the tank especially around the tread then the tank should not be able to drive away
Also all tanks have a sweet spot. What I don't get is a mine can kill a tank and every other vehicle why can't a anti tank round kill a tank then

5) get rid of the parachute its not realistic to jump off a building and use a parachute and yes I know this is just a game. It would be nice to be able to be inserted by jumping out of a plane or a helo at high altitude Or at least make a map where you have to go in by planes with everything on your back and vehicles and supplies.

6) A good map to make would be taiwan since china will someday invade it This map might be really good to play.

7) On the maps open up the buildings it would make some great close quarter combat. For example some of the tall buildings have fights that go from floor to floor you will have to fight through booby traps and room to room.

8) make it so we can peer around corners with out exposing are whole bodies.

Dick_Justice · 10-17-2005, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

I am new to the game and new to this forum which I like already. here is my list

1) Hmmv's with tow missles and have some that are equipped with the mark 19 automatic grenade launcher

-Might be nice, but youÂ´d have to add it to the other jeeps aswell.

2) get rid of the bunny hopping I know it probaly is impossible to do last time I checked no one can out jump a bullet.

-I think most people agree on that. Bunny hopping is pretty lame and it would be really easy to get rid of it (No shooting while jumping, just like when sprinting).

3) I don't know if it will be in special forces or not but I would like to see silencer on some of the weapons.

-The Snipers Pistol is Silenced.

4) With anti tank weapons I would like to see that if you hit the tank especially around the tread then the tank should not be able to drive away
Also all tanks have a sweet spot. What I don't get is a mine can kill a tank and every other vehicle why can't a anti tank round kill a tank then.

-Although it would be realistic thats probably asking to much. Thats just one of the areas were DICE would pull a line in favour of arcade. And the game being fast paced as it is, a feature like that would seem out of place.

5) get rid of the parachute its not realistic to jump off a building and use a parachute and yes I know this is just a game. It would be nice to be able to be inserted by jumping out of a plane or a helo at high altitude Or at least make a map where you have to go in by planes with everything on your back and vehicles and supplies.

-Everybody was hoping for this when BF 2 was still beeing developed. Unfortuanatly they left them in. However, parachuting lameness isnÂ´t as much an issue in BF 2 as it was in BF 1942. I can life with it...

6) A good map to make would be taiwan since china will someday invade it This map might be really good to play.

-I was thinking it might make a good scenario for Operation Flashpoint 2. However Soyuz might not agree... ; )

7) On the maps open up the buildings it would make some great close quarter combat. For example some of the tall buildings have fights that go from floor to floor you will have to fight through booby traps and room to room.

-You mean basicly an indoor Map. Well, thats not what BF 2 is really about...

8) make it so we can peer around corners with out exposing are whole bodies.

Its been asked for a couple of times but to be honest I donÂ´t see the point. Close combat is more like Quake and nobody would bother to peer around corners...

Spy98 · 10-17-2005, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

1) Hmmv's with tow missles and have some that are equipped with the mark 19 automatic grenade launcher

Will be in SF

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

2) get rid of the bunny hopping I know it probaly is impossible to do last time I checked no one can out jump a bullet.

Yeah! Me wannit!

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

3) I don't know if it will be in special forces or not but I would like to see silencer on some of the weapons.

SpecOps and Snipers pistols are silenced.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

4) With anti tank weapons I would like to see that if you hit the tank especially around the tread then the tank should not be able to drive away

Too realistic. Making the games pace slow.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

Also all tanks have a sweet spot.

Good ol' BF42

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

5) get rid of the parachute its not realistic to jump off a building and use a parachute and yes I know this is just a game.

Loss of fun.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

6) A good map to make would be taiwan since china will someday invade it This map might be really good to play.

Man.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

7) On the maps open up the buildings it would make some great close quarter combat. For example some of the tall buildings have fights that go from floor to floor you will have to fight through booby traps and room to room.

Good ol' BF42

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

8) make it so we can peer around corners with out exposing are whole bodies.

Sounds like a cool feature but slows down the games action-oriented fast-paced play-style.

jackbauer06 · 10-17-2005, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spy98

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

4) With anti tank weapons I would like to see that if you hit the tank especially around the tread then the tank should not be able to drive away

Too realistic. Making the games pace slow.

i believe that tanks and other vehicles do go a little slower when heavily damage, but i would like to see it take more effect, maybe on reload speed or manuverability.

BenSpazz · 10-18-2005, 12:09 AM

[quote="Spy98"]

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

mussina wrote:
Also all tanks have a sweet spot.
Good ol' BF42

tanks have sweet spots. see post- http://www.bfnation.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21576

works with both tank rounds and AT rockets.

K_Shizzle · 10-18-2005, 12:28 AM

I have said it before and i will say it again even though it will most likely never happen. I want bombers, big bombers. Not some stupid light strike fighter. I want a B-52, B-2, B-1 or even the Tu-series. I want massive carpet bombing wiping out rows of infantry. Carnage. Please consider Dice if you ever read this

Cøyøte · 10-18-2005, 12:39 AM

If they read that, theyre going to point at the CnC:Generals series for you.

BenSpazz · 10-18-2005, 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by <*>KShizzle<*>

I have said it before and i will say it again even though it will most likely never happen. I want bombers, big bombers. Not some stupid light strike fighter. I want a B-52, B-2, B-1 or even the Tu-series. I want massive carpet bombing wiping out rows of infantry. Carnage. Please consider Dice if you ever read this

the f-15 and such gets the job done all to well. ur dropping 5 high drag
500 pound bombs, they will wipe out anything they touch with ease.

Trident · 10-19-2005, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackbauer06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spy98

Quote:

Originally Posted by mussina

4) With anti tank weapons I would like to see that if you hit the tank especially around the tread then the tank should not be able to drive away

Too realistic. Making the games pace slow.

i believe that tanks and other vehicles do go a little slower when heavily damage, but i would like to see it take more effect, maybe on reload speed or manuverability.

Yea that was a featyre in 1942 remember. The tank would stop and the turret would spin really really slow.

Jan Zizka · 10-21-2005, 08:24 PM

How about including the MOAB?

Now that would make for some carnage......20,000 pounds of hot lovin....

grim reaper · 10-21-2005, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jan Zizka

How about including the MOAB?

Now that would make for some carnage......20,000 pounds of hot lovin....

How about no?

Jan Zizka · 10-21-2005, 09:02 PM

No to the MOAB??? All right, well how about Napalm then???

Trident · 10-21-2005, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jan Zizka

No to the MOAB??? All right, well how about Napalm then???

Grim doesn't like any idea that isn't his own, so you are fighting a losing battle :/

doctorynasty · 05-21-2006, 11:07 PM

i want aircraft to have to land and wait to rearm.
just buzzing the airfield is plain too easy for em, means that they rule the game.
look at the scores in a round, the highest ones are always jet-whores

Rambo_Medic · 05-22-2006, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by <*>KShizzle<*>

I want massive carpet bombing wiping out rows of infantry. Carnage.

ARCLITE FTW!

~~blackpool~~ · 05-26-2006, 03:01 AM

thats cool

10-17-2005, 09:37 AM	#1 (permalink)
mussina Private Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 2	my wish list I am new to the game and new to this forum which I like already. here is my list 1) Hmmv's with tow missles and have some that are equipped with the mark 19 automatic grenade launcher 2) get rid of the bunny hopping I know it probaly is impossible to do last time I checked no one can out jump a bullet. 3) I don't know if it will be in special forces or not but I would like to see silencer on some of the weapons. 4) With anti tank weapons I would like to see that if you hit the tank especially around the tread then the tank should not be able to drive away Also all tanks have a sweet spot. What I don't get is a mine can kill a tank and every other vehicle why can't a anti tank round kill a tank then 5) get rid of the parachute its not realistic to jump off a building and use a parachute and yes I know this is just a game. It would be nice to be able to be inserted by jumping out of a plane or a helo at high altitude Or at least make a map where you have to go in by planes with everything on your back and vehicles and supplies. 6) A good map to make would be taiwan since china will someday invade it This map might be really good to play. 7) On the maps open up the buildings it would make some great close quarter combat. For example some of the tall buildings have fights that go from floor to floor you will have to fight through booby traps and room to room. 8) make it so we can peer around corners with out exposing are whole bodies.

10-18-2005, 12:28 AM	#6 (permalink)
K_Shizzle Master Warrant Officer Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: New York, USA Posts: 1,258	I have said it before and i will say it again even though it will most likely never happen. I want bombers, big bombers. Not some stupid light strike fighter. I want a B-52, B-2, B-1 or even the Tu-series. I want massive carpet bombing wiping out rows of infantry. Carnage. Please consider Dice if you ever read this __________________ "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -Ben Franklin

10-18-2005, 12:39 AM	#7 (permalink)
Cøyøte Second Lieutenant Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,458	If they read that, theyre going to point at the CnC:Generals series for you. __________________ "We are Dyslexia of Borg. All your ass will be laminated" Don't call your ISP when your computer breaks. You dont call the Dept. of roads when your car breaks down, nor the power company when a lightbulb burns out. They dont want to hear it, and neither do we."-Coyote

10-21-2005, 08:24 PM	#10 (permalink)
Jan Zizka Private Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 81	MOAB How about including the MOAB? Now that would make for some carnage......20,000 pounds of hot lovin....

10-21-2005, 09:02 PM	#12 (permalink)
Jan Zizka Private Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 81	No MOAB... No to the MOAB??? All right, well how about Napalm then???

05-21-2006, 11:07 PM	#14 (permalink)
doctorynasty Private Join Date: May 2006 Location: ENGLAND Posts: 5	i want aircraft to have to land and wait to rearm. just buzzing the airfield is plain too easy for em, means that they rule the game. look at the scores in a round, the highest ones are always jet-whores

05-26-2006, 03:01 AM	#16 (permalink)
~~blackpool~~ Banned Join Date: May 2006 Location: somewhere in tx Posts: 58	thats cool __________________ once you go in you never come back