Favorite size/population on a BF2 map

Monkeyfeng · 08-12-2005, 03:23 PM

there's no better way of playing bf2 than 64 players in strike of karkand with no lag!

the_bulp · 08-12-2005, 06:26 PM

Yeah, I recently played a 50 person game of the 64-size Dragon Valley. Freakin awesome. I got almost no lag. Still...I'm not quite ready to vote yet.

jackbauer06 · 08-12-2005, 11:23 PM

i like the 64, on select faster west coast servers, cuz lag ruins all games like this.

Trident · 08-13-2005, 12:54 AM

I say 32 player. I would love to find good 64 player servers though. Most 64 players servers are too laggy for me.

CJMello63 · 08-13-2005, 01:08 AM

Neither.

32 on a 64 player map.

maverick514 · 08-13-2005, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJMello63

Neither.

32 on a 64 player map.

Yep!

[BFN] Night Star · 08-13-2005, 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJMello63

Neither.

32 on a 64 player map.

the battles are more dilberate this way. Instead of people just chuckin' nades and getting kills.

I vote this!

YA_MOMZ · 08-13-2005, 09:09 AM

~25 on 32

Trident · 08-13-2005, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJMello63

32 on a 64 player map.

That is nice as long as there is good team work among squads. And it seems to give pilots more area to cover and makes flying more exciting!

CJMello63 · 08-13-2005, 03:37 PM

Our server is set up as follows: Actually we have a 24 person player server for now. We will increase it later. Always GG on the big maps, especially Karkand.

fubarjonny · 08-13-2005, 10:34 PM

there is no better way to play 32 ppl is perfect

rythemagnificent · 08-28-2005, 04:35 AM

22.8 people on a 32 person server. No doubt about it.

Guru Imakuni · 08-28-2005, 07:13 AM

In 42 I'd say 64 but it's too much of a challenge to lonewolf an outpst on a 64 in BF2.

Dick_Justice · 08-28-2005, 09:16 AM

I agree that I prefer about 2/3 of the recommended players/map size.

That way you can have real squad-play rather than beeing buisy respawning from beeing shot in the back...

View Poll Results: What's your favorite size and population on a map
16 player map with 16 people	2	5.71%
32 player map with 32 people	15	42.86%
64 player map with 64 people	8	22.86%
Densely populated (16/32 player map with 64 people)	4	11.43%
Sparsely populated (32 player map with 16 people)	6	17.14%
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll

08-12-2005, 03:00 PM	#1 (permalink)
the_bulp Corporal Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 171	Favorite size/population on a BF2 map ... __________________ That\'s right, my BF2 name is not the_bulp (but it was in the demo)

08-12-2005, 03:23 PM	#2 (permalink)
Monkeyfeng Captain Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Taiwan, can you find it on the map? Posts: 2,785	there's no better way of playing bf2 than 64 players in strike of karkand with no lag! __________________

08-12-2005, 06:26 PM	#3 (permalink)
the_bulp Corporal Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 171	Yeah, I recently played a 50 person game of the 64-size Dragon Valley. Freakin awesome. I got almost no lag. Still...I'm not quite ready to vote yet. __________________ That\'s right, my BF2 name is not the_bulp (but it was in the demo)

08-13-2005, 01:08 AM	#6 (permalink)
CJMello63 Major Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Raynham, MA Posts: 3,803	Neither. 32 on a 64 player map. __________________

08-12-2005, 11:23 PM	#4 (permalink)
jackbauer06 Private 1st Class Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Tempe, Az Posts: 120	i like the 64, on select faster west coast servers, cuz lag ruins all games like this.

08-13-2005, 12:54 AM	#5 (permalink)
Trident First Sergeant Join Date: May 2005 Location: Pennsylvania - USA Posts: 578	I say 32 player. I would love to find good 64 player servers though. Most 64 players servers are too laggy for me.

08-13-2005, 09:09 AM	#9 (permalink)
YA_MOMZ Private Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 15	~25 on 32

08-13-2005, 03:37 PM	#11 (permalink)
CJMello63 Major Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Raynham, MA Posts: 3,803	Our server is set up as follows: Actually we have a 24 person player server for now. We will increase it later. Always GG on the big maps, especially Karkand. __________________

08-13-2005, 10:34 PM	#12 (permalink)
fubarjonny Private Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 24	there is no better way to play 32 ppl is perfect __________________

08-28-2005, 04:35 AM	#13 (permalink)
rythemagnificent Private Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 26	22.8 people on a 32 person server. No doubt about it. __________________ \"Crocodiles is ornery cus they got all dem teef and no toofbrush\"

08-28-2005, 07:13 AM	#14 (permalink)
Guru Imakuni Captain Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 2,309	In 42 I'd say 64 but it's too much of a challenge to lonewolf an outpst on a 64 in BF2. __________________

08-28-2005, 09:16 AM	#15 (permalink)
Dick_Justice Major Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Marl, Germany Posts: 3,350	I agree that I prefer about 2/3 of the recommended players/map size. That way you can have real squad-play rather than beeing buisy respawning from beeing shot in the back...