Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cpl. Reynolds
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by maverick514
WWD OLD, it is stupid to argue with you becasue you do not present ANY valid points, If i were to say something, you just call me a "fucking dickhead"
|
But you ARE, Mav. ;-) I mean, you have a woman, right? So you use that dick head to fuck with, right? There you go, you fucking dickhead *grin*.
Here's the link to the news article I read yesterday. I'm not sure how much national play it got, if any, but it was front cover in the Baltimore Sun yesterday morning.
http://www.sunspot.net/news/nationwo... %2Dheadlines
I think the one thing we can agree on is that, given Bush's ideology and Hussein's intransigence, war with Iraq has been inevitable from day one of his administration. |
well, if you look it like that reynolds, then I am a fucking dick-head, haha
thanks for the link (WWD, thats how you do it), I guess you can say that he was always after Saddam, but you also have to agree, like in the new article, that there will never be Isaeli-Palestinan peace without Saddam gone, which I could see as a valid argument to take him out. I believe we made a huge mistake 12 Years ago by not getting rid of him, so we are in this situation now. And unfortuntely, the only was to get Saddam out of power is with ground forces, as we can see that he can not be coersed out of power.
As for your last sentance, well, i can't completely agree. Bush isn't a war monger, but he sees that in this situation, force MUST be used to achieve the right outcome. Hopefully, other dictatorships will get a clue after this, and begin to change into a democratic government.
Well, lets hope for the best....