Battlefield Nation Forums - View Single Post

Dick_Justice · 02-29-2004, 10:15 AM

Well, Gamestar, the most read PC Mag. in Europe rated BF: Vietnam with 91 %.

That is 3 % better than Vanilla BF had in LAN Mode, and 1 % better than in I-Net.

The Pros and Cons of Vietnam were:

Pro: Good graphics, new class system, balance, faster paced game-play (you don´t need to walk around for ages to get into action)

Con: only 14 maps (some replayed), no big changes (still similar to BF)

There were some other minors ones aswell and I might add them as soon as I look them up.

Surprisingly Gamestar, in comparisson to PC Gamer said the Harware recomendation was moderate.
They said the lowest rig only needs 800 Mhz, 256 RAM and a DX 8.1 card.
Obviusly adding more RAM gives the best performance increase...

02-29-2004, 10:15 AM	#14 (permalink)
Dick_Justice Major Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Marl, Germany Posts: 3,350	Well, Gamestar, the most read PC Mag. in Europe rated BF: Vietnam with 91 %. That is 3 % better than Vanilla BF had in LAN Mode, and 1 % better than in I-Net. The Pros and Cons of Vietnam were: Pro: Good graphics, new class system, balance, faster paced game-play (you don´t need to walk around for ages to get into action) Con: only 14 maps (some replayed), no big changes (still similar to BF) There were some other minors ones aswell and I might add them as soon as I look them up. Surprisingly Gamestar, in comparisson to PC Gamer said the Harware recomendation was moderate. They said the lowest rig only needs 800 Mhz, 256 RAM and a DX 8.1 card. Obviusly adding more RAM gives the best performance increase... __________________ Plays BF 2 in Europe under the name of \"Erich_Felsner\"